<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>unsigned long geek = random(); &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/category/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjturner.net/blog</link>
	<description>Michael-John Turner: Musings from a random UNIX geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:28:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>On Microsoft&#8217;s open source patent infringement claims</title>
		<link>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2007/05/15/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2007/05/15/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael-John Turner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogs.turner.org.za/mj/archives/2007/05/15/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sent this to the rescue list this evening, in response to a discussion about the Microsoft patent infringement claims against open source software:

My feeling is that Microsoft is trying to spread FUD and scare large firms
that are considering FOSS. Companies are going to be dissuaded from using
FOSS if there is a risk that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent this to the <a href="http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue">rescue</a> list this evening, in response to a discussion about the Microsoft <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/05/28/100033867/index.htm">patent infringement claims</a> against open source software:</p>
<blockquote><p>
My feeling is that Microsoft is trying to spread FUD and scare large firms<br />
that are considering FOSS. Companies are going to be dissuaded from using<br />
FOSS if there is a risk that they may have to pay unknown &#8220;future<br />
royalties&#8221; because the software they&#8217;re using violates a Microsoft patent.                                                   </p>
<p>I wonder if this will all just mysteriously blow over in a few months,<br />
without Microsoft ever having released the details of the patents<br />
supposedly violated. By which time, of course, enough FUD will be spread in<br />
the market, particularly amongst those who don&#8217;t fully understand FOSS,<br />
that Microsoft will have achieved exactly what they wanted to with their<br />
disinformation campaign.
</p></blockquote>
<p>For some reason, I thought it bore reprinting here. Yes, I do love a good conspiracy theory.<br />
<!--pp-thumb-start--><!--PictPress found no dir /home/www/weblogs.turner.org.za/mj/images//2007/05/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims--><!--pp-thumb-end--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2007/05/15/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
