<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>unsigned long geek = random(); &#187; Rants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/category/rants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjturner.net/blog</link>
	<description>Michael-John Turner: Musings from a random UNIX geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:28:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>Not all USB flash drives are created bootable</title>
		<link>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2009/03/14/not-all-usb-flash-drives-are-created-bootable/</link>
		<comments>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2009/03/14/not-all-usb-flash-drives-are-created-bootable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael-John Turner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjturner.net/blog/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently had to create a number of bootable USB flash drives to install and update systems that don&#8217;t have local CD-ROM drives. Of course, I could&#8217;ve  booted the systems using PXE, but thought using USB would be quicker&#8230; How wrong I was.
After struggling for several hours with a flash drive that refused to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently had to create a number of bootable USB flash drives to install and update systems that don&#8217;t have local CD-ROM drives. Of course, I could&#8217;ve  booted the systems using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preboot_Execution_Environment">PXE</a>, but thought using USB would be quicker&#8230; How wrong I was.</p>
<p>After struggling for several hours with a flash drive that refused to boot no matter what I did, I discovered an interesting fact &#8211; most bootloaders won&#8217;t boot from flash drives that have 2048-byte sectors. Of course, the flash drive I was using had 2048-byte sectors&#8230;  Using a flash drive with 512-byte sectors worked perfectly first time.</p>
<p>Depending on operating system, it may not be that easy to tell the sector size of the flash drive. If using a Unix system, you should see something useful in the kernel ring buffer (displayed by dmesg) when you insert the drive. </p>
<p>A non-bootable drive will display something like:<br />
<code>sd 9:0:0:0: [sdh] 258687 2048-byte hardware sectors (530 MB)</code><br />
or<br />
<code>sd0: 505 MB, 126 cyl, 64 head, 32 sec, 2048 bytes/sect x 258687 sectors</code></p>
<p>A bootable one will look something like:<br />
<code>sd 11:0:0:0: [sdh] 2061816 512-byte hardware sectors (1056 MB)</code><br />
or<br />
<code>sd0: 1006 MB, 1006 cyl, 64 head, 32 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 2062328 sectors</code><!--pp-thumb-start--><!--PictPress found no dir /home/www/weblogs.turner.org.za/mj/images//2009/03/not-all-usb-flash-drives-are-created-bootable--><!--pp-thumb-end--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2009/03/14/not-all-usb-flash-drives-are-created-bootable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Airways&#8217; special meals policy</title>
		<link>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2008/04/09/british-airways-special-meals-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2008/04/09/british-airways-special-meals-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael-John Turner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2008/04/09/british-airways-special-meals-policy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week I flew domestically within the UK and encountered British Airways&#8217; strange special meals policy for the first time. According to their website:

Special meal requests cannot be made for travel on any of the following services: all UK Domestic flights, Euro Traveller flights from the UK to Paris, Luxembourg, Dusseldorf, Jersey, Cologne, Amsterdam &#038; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week I flew domestically within the UK and encountered <a href="http://www.ba.com">British Airways&#8217;</a> strange special meals policy for the first time. According to their website:<br />
<blockquote>
Special meal requests cannot be made for travel on any of the following services: all UK Domestic flights, Euro Traveller flights from the UK to Paris, Luxembourg, Dusseldorf, Jersey, Cologne, Amsterdam &#038; Brussels, and passengers travelling on any flight on a stand-by or waitlist basis.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s rather poor (and rather strange, if you ask me). Heck, in South Africa BA even have <i>extra</i> vegetarian meals on their domestic flights for those who haven&#8217;t requested them in advance. I&#8217;m not at all impressed, but unfortunately BA seem to be the only airline that fly from Gatwick to Manchester.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> If you ask, they do have vegetarian meals onboard, even if you can&#8217;t pre-book one.<br />
<!--pp-thumb-start--><!--PictPress found no dir /home/www/weblogs.turner.org.za/mj/images//2008/04/british-airways-special-meals-policy--><!--pp-thumb-end--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2008/04/09/british-airways-special-meals-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Microsoft&#8217;s open source patent infringement claims</title>
		<link>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2007/05/15/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2007/05/15/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael-John Turner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogs.turner.org.za/mj/archives/2007/05/15/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sent this to the rescue list this evening, in response to a discussion about the Microsoft patent infringement claims against open source software:

My feeling is that Microsoft is trying to spread FUD and scare large firms
that are considering FOSS. Companies are going to be dissuaded from using
FOSS if there is a risk that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent this to the <a href="http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue">rescue</a> list this evening, in response to a discussion about the Microsoft <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/05/28/100033867/index.htm">patent infringement claims</a> against open source software:</p>
<blockquote><p>
My feeling is that Microsoft is trying to spread FUD and scare large firms<br />
that are considering FOSS. Companies are going to be dissuaded from using<br />
FOSS if there is a risk that they may have to pay unknown &#8220;future<br />
royalties&#8221; because the software they&#8217;re using violates a Microsoft patent.                                                   </p>
<p>I wonder if this will all just mysteriously blow over in a few months,<br />
without Microsoft ever having released the details of the patents<br />
supposedly violated. By which time, of course, enough FUD will be spread in<br />
the market, particularly amongst those who don&#8217;t fully understand FOSS,<br />
that Microsoft will have achieved exactly what they wanted to with their<br />
disinformation campaign.
</p></blockquote>
<p>For some reason, I thought it bore reprinting here. Yes, I do love a good conspiracy theory.<br />
<!--pp-thumb-start--><!--PictPress found no dir /home/www/weblogs.turner.org.za/mj/images//2007/05/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims--><!--pp-thumb-end--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mjturner.net/blog/archives/2007/05/15/on-microsofts-open-source-patent-infringement-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
